ReviewMolecular and cellular pediatrics2025
A systematic review of long-term cardiotoxic effects of treatment in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review in Molecular and cellular pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutritional Prevention of Oxidative Stress-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cardio-Oncology: Molecular Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Imaging for the Early Detection of Cardiotoxicity from Emerging Cancer Therapies: Mechanistic Insights Across the Pediatric and Adult Spectrum.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Paediatric cardio-oncology: strengths and challenges in developing a collaborative care pathway between oncologists and cardiologists. The Italian experience.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As progress in medical interventions for childhood cancer advances, the number of survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is rising. Presently, the overall survival rate exceeds 90% over a five-year period. With this upward trend in survival rates, there’s a pressing necessity to investigate the enduring impacts of childhood cancer treatment. This systematic literature review focuses on the various long term cardiotoxic effects as a result of these treatments. The authors conducted a systematic review to identify studies that evaluated long-term cardiotoxic effects after anthracycline treatments among survivors of childhood ALL via PubMed search engine. Studies were included if ALL survivors were < 21 years old at the time of ALL diagnosis, an average of > 5 years post diagnosis and/or > 120 weeks post completion of consolidation therapy, compared with a healthy control population, and in remission during the assessment. Compared to matched control populations, survivors of childhood ALL had significantly higher rates of diastolic dysfunction and congestive heart failure. Additionally, female sex, younger age at diagnosis, and higher total dosing of anthracyclines administered during treatment led to significantly higher measures of cardiotoxicity. This study underscores the long-term cardiotoxic effects in ALL survivors, primarily linked to anthracycline use. Inconsistent detection of diastolic dysfunction via conventional echocardiogram necessitates regular monitoring of subclinical markers to prevent premature cardiac aging and heart failure. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies to assess cardiotoxic effects throughout adult ALL survivors’ lifetimes, aiming to establish comprehensive follow-up guidelines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.