ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
The accuracy of VRF intraocular lens power calculation formula in cataract patients after radial keratotomy.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on intraocular lens power calculation in cataract patients with prior radial keratotomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Precision in Intraocular Lens Calculation for Chinese Cataract Patients with Prior History of Radial Keratotomy.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the accuracy of the VRF intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula in cataract patients after radial keratotomy (RK).
methodsThis was a retrospective study that reviewed and retrieved the medical history of patients after RK who underwent cataract surgery from April 1, 2021, to December 31, 2024, at Beijing Tongren Hospital. A total of 50 eyes of 27 patients were included. The absolute error (AE, the absolute value of the difference between the actual Spherical Equivalent after cataract surgery and the Equivalent Spherical predicted by the IOL formulas) and the percentage of eyes with AE within 0.5D, 0.75D, 1.0D, and 2.0D were calculated by using three formulas: the VRF formula, the Kane formula and the Barrett True-K No History formula and were compared.
resultsThere was a significant difference in AE values between the three formulas (X
conclusionFor this cohort of patients with cataract after RK, the VRF formula was the most accurate, and the Kane formula also demonstrated good accuracy. Both formulas can be tried to be applied to predict IOL power in patients with cataract after RK in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40613950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.