Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613890›Full record

ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025

Breeding perspectives on tackling trait genome-to-phenome (G2P) dimensionality using ensemble-based genomic prediction.

Mark Cooper, Shunichiro Tomura, Melanie J Wilkinson, Owen Powell, Carlos D Messina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A novel deep learning framework for field-scale wheat yield prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark CooperQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. mark.cooper@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9418-3359
Shunichiro TomuraQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9050-9963
Melanie J WilkinsonQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-3176
Owen PowellQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5131-4286
Carlos D MessinaAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5501-9281

Funding

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture CE200100015National Science Foundation EEC-1941529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageTrait Genome-to-Phenome (G2P) dimensionality and "breeding context" combine to influence the realised prediction skill of different whole genome prediction (WGP) methods. Theory and empirical evidence both suggest there is likely to be "No Free Lunch" for prediction-based breeding. Ensembles of diverse sets of G2P models provide a framework to expose and investigate the high G2P dimensionality of trait genetic architecture for WGP applications. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI-ML) prediction algorithms contribute novel trait G2P model diversity to ensemble-based WGP. Prediction-based breeding leveraging ensembles of G2P models creates new opportunities to identify and design novel paths for genetic gain. Improving our understanding of trait genetic architecture is motivated by creating new opportunities to enhance breeding methodology, create new selection trajectories for crop improvement, and accelerate rates of genetic gain. With access to high-throughput sequencing, phenotyping and envirotyping technologies we can model the complex multidimensional relationships between sequence variation and trait phenotypic variation that are under the influences of selection. Using the framework of the diversity prediction theorem, we consider applications of ensembles of diverse trait genome-to-phenome (G2P) models. Crop growth models (CGM) are an example of a hierarchical framework for studying the influences of quantitative trait loci (QTL) within trait networks and their interactions with different environments to determine yield. Hybrid CGM-G2P models combine elements of CGMs, to understand how trait networks influence crop yield performance, with trait G2P models, to understand influences of trait genetic architecture on selection trajectories. We discuss hybrid CGM-G2P models and their potential applications to enhance ensemble-based prediction. Multi-environment trials conducted across breeding cycles can be designed to include contrasting environments to expose the different CGM-G2P dimensions of the trait by environment interactions that are influential on selection trajectories. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI-ML) algorithms can be applied as components of ensembles to improve gene discovery and quantification of allele effects for traits to enhance G2P prediction applications. We use the trait flowering time in the maize TeoNAM experiment to illustrate and motivate further investigations of how to leverage ensembles of G2P models for prediction-based breeding.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantGenomicsModels, GeneticPlant BreedingAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningPhenotypeQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID40613890
PMCPMC12229274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.