ArticleMikrochimica acta2025
Microplastic detection in saline water utilizing a microfluidic sensor with MXene-coated electrodes and a Wheatstone bridge.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Simulation Study of a Novel Electrokinetic-Based Focusing Technique to Enhance the Real-Time Detection of Microplastics in Water Flow.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In situ detection of microplastics in aquatic environments remains challenging, with factors such as variable salinity significantly impacting sensor performance-particularly for systems that rely on electrical signal transduction. Here, we present an electro-microfluidic sensor incorporating a Wheatstone bridge and MXene-coated microwires for enhanced in situ detection of microplastics in salty water. The sensor significantly improves upon state-of-the-art technology by addressing key challenges, including reduced sensitivity and detection limits in saline water, clogging, reliance on sophisticated fabrication methods, and the need for baseline blank solutions. Using a simple DC current, the sensor effectively detects polystyrene microplastics (1-10 µm) within a concentration range 1-25 ppm, in the presence of 0-1000 ppm NaCl, representative of freshwater salinity. As a DC current is applied between two MXene-coated microwire electrodes in a microchannel, an electrophoretic force is generated, concentrating microplastics at the anode electrode. This leads to a reduction in electrical resistance, which enables the quantification of microplastics using the sensor as one of the arms of a Wheatstone bridge. Without the Wheatstone bridge and microwire MXene coating, the sensor's sensitivity significantly diminished at salinity levels above 650 ppm NaCl, especially for larger microplastics (10 µm). Bridge balancing suppressed baseline drift and raised the signal-to-noise ratio, retaining full sensitivity at 1000 ppm NaCl. The optimized sensor demonstrated a power-law response at 650 ppm NaCl and achieved limits of detection and quantification of 0.825 and 3.38 ppm, respectively. This work lays the foundation for low-cost, portable, and sensitive microplastic detection in saline aquatic samples, paving the way towards developing real-time, in situ sensors for environmental monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40613888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.