ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Comparison of neural networks for classification of urinary tract dilation from renal ultrasounds: evaluation of agreement with expert categorization.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of artificial intelligence in paediatric abdominal imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary tract dilation (UTD) is a frequent problem in infants. Automated and objective classification of UTD from renal ultrasounds would streamline their interpretations.
objectiveTo develop and evaluate the performance of different deep learning models in predicting UTD classifications from renal ultrasound images. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe searched our image archive to identify renal ultrasounds performed in infants ≤ 3-months-old for the clinical indications of prenatal UTD and urinary tract infection (9/2023-8/2024). An expert pediatric uroradiologist provided the ground truth UTD labels for representative sagittal sonographic renal images. Three different deep learning models trained with cross-entropy loss were adapted with four-fold cross-validation experiments to determine the overall performance.
resultsOur curated database included 492 right and 487 left renal ultrasounds (mean age ± standard deviation = 1.2 ± 0.1 months for both cohorts, with 341 boys/151 girls and 339 boys/148 girls, respectively). The model prediction accuracies for the right and left kidneys were 88.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], [85.8%, 91.5%]) and 80.5% (95% CI, [77.6%, 82.9%]), with weighted kappa scores of 0.90 (95% CI, [0.88, 0.91]) and 0.87 (95% CI, [0.82, 0.92]), respectively. When predictions were binarized into mild (normal/P1) and severe (UTD P2/P3) dilation, accuracies of the right and left kidneys increased to 96.3% (95% CI, [94.9%, 97.8%]) and 91.3% (95% CI, [88.5%, 94.2%]), but agreements decreased to 0.78 (95% CI, [0.73, 0.82]) and 0.75 (95% CI, [0.68, 0.82]), respectively.
conclusionDeep learning models demonstrated high accuracy and agreement in classifying UTD from infant renal ultrasounds, supporting their potential as decision-support tools in clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40613839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.