ReviewPediatric radiology2025
Faulty fetal packing: a case series and literature review.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFaulty fetal packing is an under-recognized nontraumatic entity often confused with depressed skull fracture.
objectiveTo describe cases of faulty fetal packing at our institution and their common features, management, and outcomes compared to existing literature. MATERIALS AND
methodsInstitutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study. A retrospective search through a radiology database at a quaternary freestanding children's hospital from 2014-2022 was performed for cases of faulty fetal packing. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, management, and outcome were recorded.
resultsFive cases of faulty fetal packing were identified. These neonates were born at 37-41 weeks, one by vaginal delivery and four by Cesarean section, all after long labor or difficult extraction. Parietal skull depressions were noted at birth or by 16 days after birth, and no associated traumatic findings were identified on imaging. The depressions were initially diagnosed as fractures. All patients were managed by observation, and depressions significantly improved by 2-4 months in four cases; one case was lost to follow-up after 16 days. No adverse outcomes were reported.
conclusionSkull depressions seen in faulty fetal packing should be considered in the differential diagnosis of depressed skull fracture. They typically resolve with conservative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40613838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.