Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613838›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2025

Faulty fetal packing: a case series and literature review.

Sakura M Noda, Jeffrey Otjen, Ajay S Koti, Adrienne Schlatter, Matthew Blessing, Ken Feldman, Sarah Menashe

Abstract readReviewCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sakura M NodaUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. sakuran@uw.edu.
Jeffrey OtjenUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ajay S KotiUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Adrienne SchlatterUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matthew BlessingUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ken FeldmanUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sarah MenasheUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaulty fetal packing is an under-recognized nontraumatic entity often confused with depressed skull fracture.

objectiveTo describe cases of faulty fetal packing at our institution and their common features, management, and outcomes compared to existing literature. MATERIALS AND

methodsInstitutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study. A retrospective search through a radiology database at a quaternary freestanding children's hospital from 2014-2022 was performed for cases of faulty fetal packing. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, management, and outcome were recorded.

resultsFive cases of faulty fetal packing were identified. These neonates were born at 37-41 weeks, one by vaginal delivery and four by Cesarean section, all after long labor or difficult extraction. Parietal skull depressions were noted at birth or by 16 days after birth, and no associated traumatic findings were identified on imaging. The depressions were initially diagnosed as fractures. All patients were managed by observation, and depressions significantly improved by 2-4 months in four cases; one case was lost to follow-up after 16 days. No adverse outcomes were reported.

conclusionSkull depressions seen in faulty fetal packing should be considered in the differential diagnosis of depressed skull fracture. They typically resolve with conservative management.

Indexed as

Skull Fracture, DepressedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesChildDepressionInfantNewbornSkull

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.