SynthesisInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Postmortem CT angiography of fetuses, infants and children up to 12 years old a systematic review and conceptual decision tree.
Synthesis in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postmortem CT angiography in infants and young children (pedPMCTA): Technical feasibility and emerging forensic insights from a 30-case study.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Differentiating ante-mortem from post-mortem findings on fetal and pediatric post-mortem imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostmortem CT angiography (PMCTA) enhances traditional autopsy by enabling detailed visualization of vascular structures and sources of hemorrhage. However, its application in fetuses and children remains limited due to small vessel size and the lack of standardized techniques. This systematic review critically evaluates existing literature on PMCTA in decedents under 12 years old, with the aim of identifying current practices and methodological variations to assist practitioners in selecting appropriate protocols based on age and anatomical characteristics. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature research was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar from 2004 to 2024. Eligible articles investigated PMCTA in fetuses and children up to 12 year old. Extracted data covered technical protocols, vascular access, contrast preparation, perfusion parameters and imaging outcomes. A decision tree was constructed to illustrate potential approaches by age group and anatomical features.
resultsTen studies met inclusion criteria: five focused on fetal PMCTA, four on children, and one on both populations. Considerable heterogeneity was found across protocols, especially regarding contrast media preparation and injection techniques. A conceptual decision tree was developed based on reported practices. This framework is not a validated algorithm and should be applied cautiously, with attention to individual anatomical and contextual factors.
conclusionThis review underscores the lack of standardized fetal and pediatric PMCTA protocols. It offers structured guidance while highlighting the need for further research to develop and validate consistent approaches in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40613835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.