ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2025
Expanding phenological insights: automated phenostage annotation with community science plant images.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer Vision for Monitoring Wild Bees and Wasps: A Structured Literature Review.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- PEP725: 15 years of driving European and global phenology science.The New phytologist · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant phenology plays a pivotal role in understanding the interactions between plants and their environment. Despite increasing interest in plant phenology research, documenting their spatial and temporal variability at large spatial scales remains a challenge for many species and a variety of phenostages. The use of plant identification apps results in a vast repository of plant occurrence records spanning large spatial and temporal scales. As these observations are usually accompanied by images, they could potentially be a rich source of fine-grained large scale phenological information. However, manually annotating phenological stages is time intensive, necessitating efficient automated approaches. In this study, we developed a machine learning-based workflow to automatically classify plant images into the phenological stages of flowering bud, flower, unripe fruit, ripe fruit, and senescence for nine common woody shrub and tree species. Although the process required only a small amount of training images, the classification achieved an overall accuracy of 96% across all species and phenostages. To evaluate the phenological relevance of these automatically annotated observations, we compared their temporal and spatial patterns from three years (2020-2022) with systematically collected phenological data from the German Meteorological Service (DWD). Our results revealed strong spatial and temporal consistency, particularly for the flowering stages, with interannual phenological trends aligning well between the datasets. Our results demonstrate that automatic annotation of phenological stages can be achieved with high reliability even with low manual labeling effort. Provided that a high number of images is available, these automatically labeled observations carry a strong phenological signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.