Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613829›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2025

Expanding phenological insights: automated phenostage annotation with community science plant images.

Negin Katal, Michael Rzanny, Patrick Mäder, David Boho, Hans Christian Wittich, Susanne Tautenhahn, Anke Bebber, Jana Wäldchen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Negin KatalDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str.10, 07745, Jena, Thuringia, Germany. nkatal@bgc-jena.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-7243
Michael RzannyDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str.10, 07745, Jena, Thuringia, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-5547
Patrick MäderFaculty of Biological Science, Friedrich Schiller University, Fürstengraben 1, 07743, Jena, Thuringia, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-2707
David BohoData Intensive Systems and Visualisation, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ehrenbergstraße 29, 98693, Ilmenau, Thuringia, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1499-9479
Hans Christian WittichData Intensive Systems and Visualisation, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ehrenbergstraße 29, 98693, Ilmenau, Thuringia, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2379-2093
Susanne TautenhahnDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str.10, 07745, Jena, Thuringia, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3443
Anke BebberDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str.10, 07745, Jena, Thuringia, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3156-8808
Jana WäldchenDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str.10, 07745, Jena, Thuringia, Germany. jwald@bgc-jena.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-1531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant phenology plays a pivotal role in understanding the interactions between plants and their environment. Despite increasing interest in plant phenology research, documenting their spatial and temporal variability at large spatial scales remains a challenge for many species and a variety of phenostages. The use of plant identification apps results in a vast repository of plant occurrence records spanning large spatial and temporal scales. As these observations are usually accompanied by images, they could potentially be a rich source of fine-grained large scale phenological information. However, manually annotating phenological stages is time intensive, necessitating efficient automated approaches. In this study, we developed a machine learning-based workflow to automatically classify plant images into the phenological stages of flowering bud, flower, unripe fruit, ripe fruit, and senescence for nine common woody shrub and tree species. Although the process required only a small amount of training images, the classification achieved an overall accuracy of 96% across all species and phenostages. To evaluate the phenological relevance of these automatically annotated observations, we compared their temporal and spatial patterns from three years (2020-2022) with systematically collected phenological data from the German Meteorological Service (DWD). Our results revealed strong spatial and temporal consistency, particularly for the flowering stages, with interannual phenological trends aligning well between the datasets. Our results demonstrate that automatic annotation of phenological stages can be achieved with high reliability even with low manual labeling effort. Provided that a high number of images is available, these automatically labeled observations carry a strong phenological signal.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPlant DevelopmentPlantsFlowersFruitMachine LearningTreesCitizen scienceCommunity scienceDWDMachine learningOpportunistic plant observationsPhenologyPhenostage

Identifiers

PMID40613829
PMCPMC12479636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.