ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2025
Computational modelling of aggressive B-cell lymphoma.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decades of research into the molecular signalling determinants of B cell fates, and recent progress in characterising the genetic drivers of lymphoma, has led to a detailed understanding of B cell malignancies but also revealed daunting heterogeneity. While current therapies for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma are effective for some patients, they are largely agnostic to the biology of each individual's disease, and approximately one third of patients experience relapsed/refractory disease. Consequently, the challenge is to understand how each patient's mutational burden and tumour microenvironment combine to determine their response to treatment; overcoming this challenge will improve outcomes in lymphoma. This mini review highlights how data-driven modelling, statistical approaches and machine learning are being used to unravel the heterogeneity of lymphoma. We review how mechanistic computational models provide a framework to embed patient data within knowledge of signalling. Focusing on recurrently dysregulated signalling networks in lymphoma (including NF-κB, apoptosis and the cell cycle), we discuss the application of state-of-the-art mechanistic models to lymphoma. We review recent advances in which computational models have demonstrated the power to predict prognosis, identify promising combination therapies and develop digital twins that can recapitulate clinical trial results. With the future of treatment for lymphoma poised to transition from one-size-fits-all towards personalised therapies, computational models are well-placed to identify the right treatments to the right patients, improving outcomes for all lymphoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.