Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analyses of Ibrutinib Combined With Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma.
Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficacy and safety of ibrutinib 560 mg once daily or placebo combined with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) were assessed in patients with mantle cell lymphoma in a randomized phase 3 study (SHINE). The analysis described explores the ibrutinib population pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response (E-R) relationships of selected efficacy and safety endpoints. Ibrutinib PK was consistent with previous assessments, characterized by an open two-compartment disposition model with sequential zero-first order oral absorption after a lag time. Ibrutinib treatment was efficacious in extending PFS versus placebo (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.96), although similar OS, CRR, and ORR were observed. PFS benefit was similar across the quartiles of ibrutinib exposure, suggesting that systemic exposures obtained provide maximal clinical response. There was no association between ibrutinib exposure and incidence of major hemorrhage, Grade ≥ 3 liver function test abnormalities, Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, Grade ≥ 2 diarrhea, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to death, and TEAEs leading to ibrutinib dose reduction. However, the incidence of all Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs, all serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to ibrutinib discontinuation, Grade ≥ 1 atrial fibrillation, any hemorrhage, and Grade ≥ 3 infection was higher in the ibrutinib than placebo arm. Of these, only atrial fibrillation and any hemorrhage increased with increasing exposure. Overall, ibrutinib 560 mg, combined with BR, consistently improves PFS across the ibrutinib exposure range evaluated. According to the results of the exposure-response analysis, for patients who develop specific toxicities, dose reduction according to the prescribing information may improve the ibrutinib tolerability while keeping adequate exposure to maintain efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.