Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613685›Full record

ArticleJournal of aging & social policy2025

Implications of the Growth of Defined Contribution Retirement Plans for Safety Net Eligibility: The Case of Dual Eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid.

Melissa McInerney, Jennifer M Mellor, Carolyn Pelnik, Lindsay M Sabik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aging & social policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa McInerneyDepartment of Economics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3064-8313
Jennifer M MellorDepartment of Economics, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4056-3305
Carolyn PelnikDepartment of Economics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2508-3920
Lindsay M SabikDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0613-4929

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS025422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small balances from tax-preferred retiremet accounts such as 401(k)s and IRAs can render some older adults ineligible for Medicaid, an important supplement to Medicare for older and disabled Americans who have low income and assets. The purpose of this study is to understand whether older low-income adults have assets in these tax-preferred accounts, hereafter defined contribution (DC) wealth, and whether DC wealth has implications for Medicaid eligibility. Using 2015-19 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) data, the study finds half of all older adults with low income have either DC wealth or income from defined benefit (DB) pension plans and DC wealth is becoming more prevalent among younger cohorts of older adults, who are more likely to have DC wealth than DB income. Older adults with DC wealth are 5.5 percentage points less likely to be eligible for Medicaid than similar peers with DB income. In an exercise where DC wealth is hypothetically converted to an annuity, this eligibility gap falls by one-third to nearly one half. A possible policy solution would be to exclude DC wealth from the asset test, which would target the least advantaged beneficiaries and mimic the current eligibility criteria of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Indexed as

Asset testsMedicaid eligibilityolder adultsretirement benefits

Identifiers

PMID40613685
PMCPMC12291076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.