ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2025
Repositioning of moxidectin: a promising approach in cutaneous leishmaniasis therapy.
Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis presents a significant challenge to public health due to its diverse clinical manifestations, resistance development, and treatment-related adverse effects. Here, we examined the efficacy of ivermectin, moxidectin (MOX), afoxolaner, and permethrin against all stages of Leishmania tropica and THP-1 cells. We also assessed the potential for resistance acquisition after 15 rounds of artificial selection. To elucidate the mode of action of MOX, we employed RNA sequencing, molecular dynamics simulation, and chloride flux assays. Additionally, we evaluated the therapeutic index of MOX using the Galleria mellonella infection model. MOX demonstrated the highest selectivity index against leishmaniasis (promastigotes: 0.58 μM; amastigotes: 0.96 μM; host cells: 60.29 μM). Moreover, MOX exhibited the lowest resistance acquisition in both promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes after 15 rounds of artificial selection, with resistance ratios of 17.23 and 4.59, respectively. Post-exposure to MOX, differential gene expression profiles showed both stage-specific and stage-unspecific enrichment of gene families involved in crucial biological processes. Moreover, molecular dynamics simulations revealed a potential neutralizing effect of MOX on the chloride channel of L. tropica. Specifically, MOX binds to the selectivity filter, potentially disrupting the osmotic equilibrium and thereby killing the parasite. The in vivo introduction of MOX significantly inhibited the growth of L. tropica in G. mellonella larvae, resulting in decreased rates of mortality and melanization. These findings indicate that MOX is a promising candidate for the treatment of L. tropica infections, warranting further investigation and potential consideration for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.