ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2025
Multiple Genomic Technologies Validate Rare Novel Variant and Direct Medical Care in Vascular Anomalies.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Somatic Driver to Molecular Therapy in Retinal, Choroidal and Periocular Vascular Disease: Mosaicism, Targetable Pathways and Ocular Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Genotype-directed Targeted Therapy for Pediatric Vascular Malformations: A Systematic Review.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Some vascular anomalies, such as hamartomas associated with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) and fibroadipose vascular anomaly (FAVA, often due to PI3KCA variants), share similar clinical, radiological, and histopathological presentations that challenge clinicians to provide an accurate diagnosis. Genetic testing can help clinicians differentiate these two vascular anomalies to provide proper treatment for patients. An 11-year-old female with macrocephaly presented with a painful lesion in her right ankle and was initially diagnosed with FAVA and treated with sirolimus. Initial genetic testing from a biopsy sample was negative. Subsequently, however, repeat clinical genetic testing and research deep exome sequencing from a second tissue biopsy sample identified a mosaic variant in PTEN (NM_00314.7) c.683delA p.Asn228Ilefs*28 with a variant allele fraction (VAF) of 2.0%-2.1%, ultimately changing the diagnosis from FAVA to a PTEN hamartoma. To evaluate the germline status of this patient, PTEN sequencing and deletion duplication testing was sent from saliva and identified a different variant in PTEN (NM_000314.4) c.202_209+18delins27, estimated to be 20%-30% VAF. Sanger sequencing validated this novel variant as germline, leading to cancer screening in the patient. This case exemplifies the need for genetic reevaluation as sequencing technology continues to update rapidly, repeat sampling in cases of suspected mosaicism, the two-hit hypothesis in the development of vascular malformations, and emphasizes the importance of genetic diagnosis in vascular malformations, especially in this case which led to the identification of a cancer predisposition syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.