ArticleJournal of global health2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of cardiovascular health care personnel regarding coronary CTA and AI-assisted diagnosis: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for medical applications, particularly in coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). We assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of cardiovascular health care personnel regarding coronary CTA and AI-assisted diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from 1 July to 1 August 2024 at Tsinghua University Hospital, Beijing, China. Healthcare professionals, including both physicians and nurses, aged ≥18 years were eligible to participate. We used a structured questionnaire to collect demographic information and KAP scores. We analysed the data using correlation and regression methods, along with structural equation modelling. Results: Among 496 participants, 58.5% were female, 52.6% held a bachelor's degree, and 40.7% worked in radiology. Mean KAP scores were 13.87 (standard deviation (SD) = 4.96, possible range = 0-20) for knowledge, 28.25 (SD = 4.35, possible range = 8-40) for attitude, and 31.67 (SD = 8.23, possible range = 10-50) for practice. Knowledge (r = 0.358; P < 0.001) and attitude positively correlated with practice (r = 0.489; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that educational level, department affiliation, and job satisfaction were significant predictors of knowledge. Attitude was influenced by marital status, department, and years of experience, while practice was shaped by knowledge, attitude, departmental factors, and job satisfaction. Structural equation modelling showed that knowledge was directly affected by gender (β = -0.121; P = 0.009), workplace (β = -0.133; P = 0.004), department (β = -0.197; P < 0.001), employment status (β = -0.166; P < 0.001), and night shift frequency (β = 0.163; P < 0.001). Attitude was directly influenced by marriage (β = 0.124; P = 0.006) and job satisfaction (β = -0.528; P < 0.001). Practice was directly affected by knowledge (β = 0.389; P < 0.001), attitude (β = 0.533; P < 0.001), and gender (β = -0.092; P = 0.010). Additionally, gender (β = -0.051; P = 0.010) and marriage (β = 0.066; P = 0.007) had indirect effects on practice. Conclusions: Cardiovascular health care personnel exhibited suboptimal knowledge, positive attitudes, and relatively inactive practices regarding coronary CTA and AI-assisted diagnosis. Targeted educational efforts are needed to enhance knowledge and support the integration of AI into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.