Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613354›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Development and Initial Validation of a Brief Measure of TikTok Addiction in a Multi-Country Sample.

Feten Fekih-Romdhane, Amira Mohammed Ali, Hanaa Ahmed Mohamed Shuwiekh, Mai Helmy, Abdallah Y Naser, Kamel Jebreen, Sami El Khatib, Mirna Fawaz, Tasnim Swaitti, Eqbal Radwan and 4 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Feten Fekih-RomdhaneTunis Al Manar University, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-2569-8017
Amira Mohammed AliDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Smouha, Alexandria, Egypt.
Hanaa Ahmed Mohamed ShuwiekhDepartment of Psychology, Fayoum University, Fayum, Egypt.
Mai HelmyPsychology department, College of education, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Abdallah Y NaserDepartment of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Pharmacy, faculty of pharmacy, Isra University, Amman, Jordan.
Kamel JebreenDepartment of Mathematics, Palestine Technical University-Kadoorie, Hebron, State of Palestine.
Sami El KhatibDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese International University, Bekaa, Lebanon.
Mirna FawazSchool of Nursing, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Tasnim SwaittiSmart University College for Modern Education, Hebron, Palestine.
Eqbal RadwanDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine.
Inad NawajahDepartment of Mathematics, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine.
Diana MalaebCollege of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Sahar ObeidSchool of Arts and Sciences, Social and Education Sciences Department, Lebanese American University, Jbeil, Lebanon.
Souheil HallitSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-6918-5689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dramatic increase in TikTok use over the past few years has generated a major challenge globally. Providing researchers with a valid, reliable, yet brief measure may stimulate large-scale epidemiological research that can help to clarify the mechanisms involved in susceptibility to TikTok addiction and guide the development of prevention strategies. The objective of our study was to design and validate a brief measure that we labelled the TikTok Addiction Test (TAT) using a multi-country sample, with a specific focus on measuring the 6 core features of addiction through 1 item each.

methodA multi-country survey with a cross-sectional design was conducted in February of 2025 among general population adults (N = 3362) from five Arab countries: Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Oman, and Palestine.

resultsA single-factor solution was obtained in the Exploratory Factor Analysis and corroborated in the Confirmatory Factor Analysis, indicating an adequate goodness-of-fit indices, with all 6 items satisfactorily loading on the same latent variable. In addition, the internal consistency reliability indicators were excellent for the entire measure, with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega values of 0.91. We found invariance in factor structure, factor loadings, and intercepts between sexes and for country groups. A total of 207 (6.2%) participants were identified as TikTok addicts. Females exhibited significantly higher mean TAT scores than males. Palestinian and Lebanese participants reported the highest TikTok addiction scores, followed by Egyptians, Jordanians, and Omani. Finally, significant positive associations were observed between TAT scores and smartphone addiction, depression, anxiety, and loneliness, supporting the concurrent validity of the scale.

conclusionResults suggest that the TAT is a simple and useful instrument for measuring TikTok addiction of general population adults with only 6 items and 1 factor. As a brief self-report measure, the TAT can be highly valuable in time- and resource-pressured real-life settings, and offers a foundation for future research in this area.

Indexed as

Internet Addiction DisorderAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEgyptFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansJordanMaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultbrief measurepsychometric evaluationscale developmentTATTikTok addiction

Identifiers

PMID40613354
PMCPMC12227913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.