Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025
The Impact of Nicotine Reduction on Cigarette Reinforcement Value Within a Marketplace Containing Alternative Nicotine Delivery Products: A Secondary Analysis of a Multi-Site Trial.
Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA mandated reduction in the nicotine content of cigarettes would likely improve public health. Prior research has shown that assignment to very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes reduces the reinforcement value of cigarettes. However, no studies have evaluated changes in reinforcement for smoking after experience with VLNC cigarettes in a marketplace where noncombusted nicotine products are available. AIMS AND
methodsAdult participants who smoke cigarettes (n = 438) were randomized 1:1 to VLNC or normal nicotine content cigarettes for 12 weeks. Participants purchased products using points valued at $1 from an experimental tobacco marketplace that contained study cigarettes and noncombusted nicotine products. At the 12-week visit, participants completed hypothetical purchase tasks for each product. Demand parameters were calculated, including intensity (consumption when product is free), breakpoint (price when consumption is reduced to zero), Pmax (price that produces maximum daily spending), Omax (maximum amount spent in a single day), and α (rate of change in consumption across the demand curve).
resultsAssignment to VLNC cigarettes reduced demand for study cigarettes across all parameters, and reduced demand for usual brand cigarettes for intensity and breakpoint, but not other parameters. Assignment to VLNC cigarettes increased Omax for e-cigarettes, but not other demand parameters. There were no significant differences in demand parameters for other products.
conclusionsA mandated reduction in cigarette nicotine content is likely to reduce the reinforcement value of cigarettes in a marketplace where noncombusted products are available, which may drive reductions in the prevalence of smoking and shift people who smoke toward noncombusted products. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first study to show that assignment to VLNC cigarettes along with access to noncombusted nicotine products reduces reinforcement value for both low nicotine and normal nicotine cigarettes, and may increase the reinforcement value of e-cigarettes. These results suggest that a mandated reduction in nicotine will decrease the prevalence of smoking and may increase the use of other noncombusted products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.