ReviewInternational journal of oncology2025
Review in International journal of oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- SFPQ Promotes Homologous Recombination via mRNA Stabilization of RAD51 and Its Paralogs.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Article
- High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma in the Genomics Era: Current Applications, Challenges and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: biological determinants and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- SFPQ Promotes Homologous Recombination via mRNA Stabilization of RAD51 and Its Paralogs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Decoding protein lactylation in the pathogenesis and progression of gynecological cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Case Report: Metachronous pancreatic adenocarcinoma following HER2-positive breast cancer and the implications of non-BRCA germline variants with TP53-mutant disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maintaining genomic stability is essential for reducing the risk of carcinogenesis. Homologous recombination (HR) is a high‑fidelity DNA repair mechanism that addresses double‑strand breaks and interstrand crosslinks. The present review examined two key components of HR:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.