Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613091›Full record

Reviewnpj computational materials2025

Machine learning and data-driven methods in computational surface and interface science.

Lukas Hörmann, Wojciech G Stark, Reinhard J Maurer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj computational materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lukas HörmannDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Wojciech G StarkDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Reinhard J MaurerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning and data-driven methods have started to transform the study of surfaces and interfaces. Here, we review how data-driven methods and machine learning approaches complement simulation workflows and contribute towards tackling grand challenges in computational surface science from 2D materials to interface engineering and electrocatalysis. Challenges remain, including the scarcity of large datasets and the need for more electronic structure methods for interfaces.

Indexed as

Surface chemistrySurfaces, interfaces and thin filmsTheory and computation

Identifiers

PMID40613091
PMCPMC12213647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.