ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Time-variant Granger causality analysis for intuitive perception collision risk in driving scenario: an EEG study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intuition is a rapid and unconscious cognitive process that is widely utilized in driving scenario. The current study examines the neural mechanisms behind intuitive driving by performing a time-varying Granger causality analysis on source-domain EEG data. We construct an innovative experimental setup that utilizes immersive driving simulation videos to elicit intuitive decision-making alongside with neural activities. We performed Granger causality analysis on a sliding window basis that resulted in a directed connectivity model. By examining the node strength, we identify that the experienced drivers increase activation in intrinsic functional networks associated with visual attention and decision-making, which can be considered as the evidence for possessing better collision risk perception when compared to novice drivers. We also identify that experienced drivers exhibit a more stable and dispersed connectivity, especially in the beta band. In contrast, novice drivers exhibited more complex and less efficient connectivity, which can be interpreted as evidence of more efficient neural strategies for rapid decision-making in experienced drivers. This work not only advances the understanding of intuitive driving but also offers valuable insights for developing intelligent driving hazard perception systems. By targeting individual differences, we pave the way for personalized training programs to enhance driving safety and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.