Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613087›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Symptomatic treatment of infantile nystagmus: a systematic review.

Xuanwei Li, Bianca Huurneman, Jeroen Goossens

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuanwei LiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Bianca HuurnemanDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jeroen GoossensDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infantile nystagmus (IN) is a neuro-ophthalmic condition characterized by involuntary rhythmic eye movements that manifest early in childhood. The surge of recent articles focusing on the treatment of IN demonstrates the need for a new systematic review of the intervention options. The diverse causes of IN complicate its differentiation from symptoms secondary to other conditions, presenting challenges for clinical decision-making and systematic review. This study provides the first extensive, focused summary of symptomatic treatment options for IN. We noted that current approaches can be broadly categorized into four types of interventions: surgical, pharmacological, optical, and perceptual training methods, each offering distinct benefits and limitations. Most of the included studies (28/52) focused on invasive surgical interventions. Alternatively, the nascent perceptual training showed promising improvements in both visual acuity (VA) and quality of life (QoL). Heterogeneous reporting of treatment outcomes for IN hindered meta-analysis and precise comparison of intervention effects, underscoring an urgent need for standardized outcome measures in future studies. We further suggest including functional vision measurements and QoL assessments to better address patient well-being, rethinking invasive surgical approaches and exploring non-invasive treatment modalities in clinical practice.

Indexed as

infantile nystagmusmethodological heterogeneityperceptual trainingsymptomatic treatmentvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID40613087
PMCPMC12222088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.