SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Symptomatic treatment of infantile nystagmus: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported Visual Function in Ataxias and Association with Clinical Oculomotor Findings.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infantile nystagmus (IN) is a neuro-ophthalmic condition characterized by involuntary rhythmic eye movements that manifest early in childhood. The surge of recent articles focusing on the treatment of IN demonstrates the need for a new systematic review of the intervention options. The diverse causes of IN complicate its differentiation from symptoms secondary to other conditions, presenting challenges for clinical decision-making and systematic review. This study provides the first extensive, focused summary of symptomatic treatment options for IN. We noted that current approaches can be broadly categorized into four types of interventions: surgical, pharmacological, optical, and perceptual training methods, each offering distinct benefits and limitations. Most of the included studies (28/52) focused on invasive surgical interventions. Alternatively, the nascent perceptual training showed promising improvements in both visual acuity (VA) and quality of life (QoL). Heterogeneous reporting of treatment outcomes for IN hindered meta-analysis and precise comparison of intervention effects, underscoring an urgent need for standardized outcome measures in future studies. We further suggest including functional vision measurements and QoL assessments to better address patient well-being, rethinking invasive surgical approaches and exploring non-invasive treatment modalities in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.