ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Neural decoding of Aristotle tactile illusion using deep learning-based fMRI classification.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aristotle illusion is a well-known tactile illusion which causes the perception of one object as two. EEG analysis was employed to investigate the neural correlates of Aristotle illusion, yet was limited due to low spatial resolution of EEG. This study aimed to identify brain regions involved in the Aristotle illusion using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and deep learning-based analysis of fMRI data. Methods: While three types of tactile stimuli (Aristotle, Reverse, Asynchronous) were applied to thirty participants' fingers, we collected fMRI data, and recorded the number of stimuli each participant perceived. Four convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained for perception-based classification tasks (the occurrence of Aristotle illusion vs. Reverse illusion, the occurrence vs. absence of Reverse illusion), and stimulus-based classification tasks (Aristotle vs. Reverse, Reverse vs. Asynchronous, and Aristotle vs. Asynchronous). Results: Simple fully convolution network (SFCN) achieved the highest classification accuracy of 68.4% for the occurrence of Aristotle illusion vs. Reverse illusion, and 80.1% for the occurrence vs. absence of Reverse illusion. For stimulus-based classification tasks, all CNN models yielded accuracies around 50% failing to distinguish among the three types of applied stimuli. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) analysis revealed salient brain regions-of-interest (ROIs) for the perception-based classification tasks, including the somatosensory cortex and parietal regions. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that perception-driven neural responses are classifiable using fMRI-based CNN models. Saliency analysis of the trained CNNs reveals the involvement of the somatosensory cortex and parietal regions in making classification decisions, consistent with previous research. Other salient ROIs include orbitofrontal cortex, middle temporal pole, supplementary motor area, and middle cingulate cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.