ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Uterine Contraction Pain Post-Cesarean Section: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Uterine contraction pain post-cesarean section (UCPCS) is one of the main complaints for mothers in the early stages of the puerperium. Acupuncture, a non-pharmacological therapy, has shown sound analgesic effects with almost no toxic side effects. This study uses acupuncture as an intervention and aimed to provide strong evidence for the clinical efficacy of acupuncture in treating UCPCS. Patients and Methods: This single-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at the Ludian County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China. Participants (138) are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an observation or control group following cesarean section. Both groups receive routine postpartum care, the control group with sham acupuncture and the observation group with conventional acupuncture for 3 days. The primary outcome is the mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of the UCPCS. Secondary outcomes include the mean of UCPCS intensity, frequency, total duration, number of days to disappear, amount of vaginal bleeding and lactation, time to first lactation, and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score. The final results will be analyzed in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle using SPSS V.28.0. Discussion: This is the first RCT using non-penetrating sham acupuncture as a control to validate the clinical efficacy of acupuncture for UCPCS. The results of this study are expected to provide an effective therapeutic option for UCPCS, as well as offer clinicians and researchers strong evidence regarding non-pharmacological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.