ArticleHealth policy OPEN2025
Catastrophic and impoverishing out-of-pocket payments for health care in Poland in 2013-2021.
Article in Health policy OPEN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global norms, local institutions: a controlled comparative case study of WHO essential medicines policy adoption in Eastern Europe.Globalization and health · 2026Article
- Perceptions of public and private health services in Poland: findings from a 2025 nationwide survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patients' perspectives on healthcare factors and symptom course in persistent somatic symptoms: findings from a cross-sectional survey in four European countries.BMJ public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protecting households from financial hardship when accessing health care is a universal policy objective across European countries. Previous analyses have shown that households in Poland relatively often experience financial strain due to out-of-pocket payments for health. This study aims to provide new evidence on financial protection in Poland, using indicators of catastrophic and impoverishing health spending. We used data from annual household budget surveys between 2013 and 2021. Catastrophic spending is defined as payments for health greater than 40% of the household's capacity to pay, while impoverishing spending occurs when out-of-pocket payments are higher than the capacity to pay. We employed logistic regression to identify factors associated with catastrophic payments. The incidence of catastrophic spending was 9% in 2021 and remained relatively constant over the years analyzed, nearing 10% only in 2020. Further, 3.3% of households in 2021 were impoverished or further impoverished, down from 4.1% in 2013. Payments for medicines contribute the most to catastrophic spending, but the role of other services has been increasing. We found a significant association between catastrophic payments and gender, age, education, disability, residence place, number of children, main source of income, and consumption level. It is necessary to address existing coverage gaps and to evaluate implemented policies in order to develop more effective measures to reduce the burden of out-of-pocket payments in Poland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.