ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
Vision toolkit part 1. Neurophysiological foundations and experimental paradigms in eye-tracking research: a review.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and analysis of a packaging design preference model using eye-tracking degree of preference.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Vision toolkit part 3. Scanpaths and derived representations for gaze behavior characterization: a review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Vision toolkit part 2. features and metrics for assessing oculomotor signal: a review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye-tracking research offers valuable insights into human gaze behavior by examining the neurophysiological mechanisms that govern eye movements and their dynamic interactions with external stimuli. This review explores the foundational principles of oculomotor control, emphasizing the neural subsystems responsible for gaze stabilization and orientation. Although controlled laboratory studies have significantly advanced our understanding of these mechanisms, their ecological validity remains a critical limitation. However, the emergence of mobile eye tracking technologies has enabled research in naturalistic environments, uncovering the intricate interplay between gaze behavior and inputs from the head, trunk, and sensory systems. Furthermore, rapid technological advancements have broadened the application of eye-tracking across neuroscience, psychology, and related disciplines, resulting in methodological fragmentation that complicates the integration of findings across fields. In response to these challenges, this review underscores the distinctions between head-restrained and naturalistic conditions, emphasizing the importance of bridging neurophysiological insights with experimental paradigms. By addressing these complexities, this work seeks to elucidate the diverse methodologies employed for recording eye movements, providing critical guidance to mitigate potential pitfalls in the selection and design of experimental paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.