ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Interpretation bias among breast cancer patients with post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate interpretation bias in breast cancer patients exhibiting post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), which may affect their cognitive and emotional processing of ambiguous stimuli. Understanding this bias could help inform interventions to address cognitive distortions in this population. Methods: A total of 234 breast cancer patients were assessed for PTSS using the Impact of Event Scale (IES). Based on their PTSS status, 40 participants were randomly selected from both PTSS-positive and PTSS-negative groups, resulting in 80 participants. All participants completed an ambiguous facial expression judgment task. Results: The PTSS group showed significantly higher proportions of "sad" judgments and longer reaction times than the non-PTSS group across all levels of facial expression ambiguity, suggesting increased cognitive load when interpreting ambiguous emotional stimuli. Conclusion: Breast cancer patients with PTSS exhibit a marked negative interpretation bias, which may exacerbate cognitive distortions. These findings highlight the importance of addressing interpretation biases in therapeutic interventions for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.