ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2025
Understanding human co-manipulation via motion and haptic information to enable future physical human-robotic collaborations.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human teams intuitively and effectively collaborate to move large, heavy, or unwieldy objects. However, understanding of this interaction in literature is limited. This is especially problematic given our goal to enable human-robot teams to work together. Therefore, to better understand how human teams work together to eventually enable intuitive human-robot interaction, in this paper we examine four sub-components of collaborative manipulation (co-manipulation), using motion and haptics. We define co-manipulation as a group of two or more agents collaboratively moving an object. We present a study that uses a large object for co-manipulation as we vary the number of participants (two or three) and the roles of the participants (leaders or followers), and the degrees of freedom necessary to complete the defined motion for the object. In analyzing the results, we focus on four key components related to motion and haptics. Specifically, we first define and examine a static or rest state to demonstrate a method of detecting transitions between the static state and an active state, where one or more agents are moving toward an intended goal. Secondly, we analyze a variety of signals (e.g. force, acceleration, etc.) during movements in each of the six rigid-body degrees of freedom of the co-manipulated object. This data allows us to identify the best signals that correlate with the desired motion of the team. Third, we examine the completion percentage of each task. The completion percentage for each task can be used to determine which motion objectives can be communicated via haptic feedback. Finally, we define a metric to determine if participants divide two degree-of-freedom tasks into separate degrees of freedom or if they take the most direct path. These four components contribute to the necessary groundwork for advancing intuitive human-robot interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.