ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Predicting biomarkers of progressive pulmonary fibrosis: morphological, cytokine profile, and clinical portrait.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective phosphodiesterase 4B inhibition in fibrotic lung disease: a scoping review of vascular-immune mechanisms and extrapulmonary implications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Article
- Explainable pulmonary fibrosis detection using edge-strengthened dilated holistic edge detection-based lung segmentation and ResNet-V2 classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Quantification and Analysis of Lung Involvement by Artificial Intelligence in Patients with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis Treated with Nintedanib.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The term progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) refers to a specific disorder that becomes worse despite optimal treatment. The pathogenic explanation of this progressive worsening is still to be found. In this study, we explored whether any histological, molecular, radiological, or clinical features could predict a progressive phenotype in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. Methods: Two hundred and fifteen patients with PPF other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) were followed in our ILD clinic between January 2016 and May 2023. Based on tissue block availability, 48 patients were definitively enrolled. Progression was defined according to the most recent guidelines. Clinical, radiological, and functional data were also collected retrospectively and correlated with tissue morphological and molecular cytokine profiles. Results: Fifteen patients were classified as progressors (PPF) and 33 as non-progressors (nPPF) with similar age at diagnosis and gender. PPF showed a higher prevalence of traction bronchiectasis (80% vs. 27%; p=<0.001) at CT scan and lower functional parameters [FVC: 2.42 L vs. 3.37 L; p=0.004; TLC: 3.83 L vs. 4.65 L; p=0.027] at diagnosis. Lung specimens revealed a significant overexpression of IL9 in the PPF compared to the nPPF group (p=0.049). Boruta algorithm analysis showed that lymphoid aggregates and traction bronchiectasis at diagnosis are the most important variables in determining the PPF status. Conclusions: The present results increase the understanding of the pathological mechanisms of PPF, offering potential avenues for improved prognostication and therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.