Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612938›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

A novel, rapid, and practical prognostic model for sepsis patients based on dysregulated immune cell lactylation.

Chang Li, Mei He, PeiChi Shi, Lu Yao, XiangZhi Fang, XueFeng Li, QiLan Li, XiaoBo Yang, JiQian Xu, You Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chang LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Mei HeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
PeiChi ShiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Lu YaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
XiangZhi FangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
XueFeng LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
QiLan LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
XiaoBo YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
JiQian XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
You ShangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a global health burden characterized by high heterogeneity and uncontrolled immune response, with a notable lack of reliable methods for early prognosis and risk stratification. Epigenetic modifications, particularly lactylation, have recently emerged as key regulators in the early pathophysiology of sepsis. However, their potential for immune-related mortality risk stratification remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to investigate dynamic changes in lactylation during sepsis progression and to develop a rapid, lactylation-based prognostic signature. Methods: Blood transcriptional profiles and single-cell RNA sequencing data from septic patients were analyzed to assess glycolytic activity and lactylation in relation to patient mortality. Patients were stratified into subgroups using k-means clustering based on lactylation levels. Machine learning algorithms, integrated with pseudotime trajectory reconstruction, were employed to map the temporal dynamics of lactylation. A prognostic model was then constructed using lactylation-associated hub genes and validated in external transcriptomic datasets, a prospective single-center clinical cohort. The underlying mechanism was further explored Results: The study systematically characterized the dynamic alterations in lactylation patterns and immune microenvironment across distinct patient clusters. A lactylation-based prognostic model was developed, comprising eight key genes (CD160, HELB, ING4, PIP5K1C, SRPRA, CDCA7, FAM3A, PPP1R15A), and demonstrated strong predictive performance for sepsis outcomes (AUC = 0.78 in the training cohort; AUC = 0.73 in the validation cohort). Temporal expression patterns of lactylation-related hub genes revealed dynamic immune responses throughout disease progression. In the prospective cohort of septic patients (N = 51), the model showed high predictive accuracy for survival, with AUCs of 0.82 (7-day), 0.80 (14-day), and 0.86 (28-day). Additionally, global lactylation levels were significantly elevated in THP-1 cells following treatment with Sephin1, a selective PPP1R15A inhibitor, suggesting a mechanistic link. Conclusions: Lactylation is significantly associated with increased mortality risk in sepsis. The proposed individualized prognostic model, based on dysregulated immune cell metabolism, accurately predicts early mortality and may inform optimized clinical management of septic patients.

Indexed as

MonocytesSepsisAgedBiomarkersFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTranscriptomeBiomarkersearly prognostic predictionepigenetic modificationslactylationmetabolismPPP1R15Asepsis

Identifiers

PMID40612938
PMCPMC12221935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.