ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Implementation of a statewide bundle on obstetric hemorrhage in New York.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Obstetric hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of maternal death and also one of the most preventable. In 2017, a New York statewide initiative led by the New York State Perinatal Quality Collaborative asked birthing hospitals to implement an ACOG District II Safe Motherhood Initiative evidence-based bundle on recognition and management of hemorrhage, and to assist and offer extensive education, assistance, and feedback. This report describes the process and results. Methods: The bundle was available to all birthing hospitals. Hospitals were asked to implement 21 measures, with a goal of each measure being implemented by at least 85% of hospitals. Webinars and teaching sessions were attended by participating hospital teams to foster collaborative learning, share best practices, provide technical assistance and education, and serve as a forum for discussion of successes and barriers. Hospitals used standardized data collection forms to report measure implementation, aggregate patient data, and for major hemorrhages (requiring massive transfusion, hysterectomy, transfer to a higher level of care, or death), deidentified patient-level data. Data were analyzed using chi-square, repeated measures ANOVA, linear regression, and Cochrane's Q tests. Results: Eighty-six hospitals initially engaged (78 ultimately completed), with teams attending 35 webinars and 3 learning sessions. At the initiative's start, 6 of the 21 measures already were in place at 85% of hospitals; by the initiative's end, this increased to 19 of 21 with significant increases ( Conclusion: A comprehensive statewide initiative encouraging hospitals to adopt an evidence-based bundle on obstetric hemorrhage was successful in that 19 of 21 measures were implemented by ≥85% of hospitals. Focused statewide initiatives can improve hospitals' ability to provide evidence-based obstetrical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.