ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2025
Health systems and quality of life: The situation of South Africans with spinal cord injury.
Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL) through physical disabilities and reduced social participation. Objectives: This study compared health system indicators, social factors and self-reported QoL between individuals with SCI accessing public versus private healthcare in South Africa. Method: A cross-sectional survey using the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) community survey questionnaire was conducted with 200 SCI individuals (156 public, 44 private sector) from Cape Town and Pretoria. Chi-square tests and correlation analyses were performed. Results: Significant disparities were observed between cohorts. Public sector participants reported higher rates of disability pension receipt (82.1% vs 54.5%) and greater challenges accessing various services. Overall, self-reported QoL was 56%, with the private cohort reporting significantly higher satisfaction (64% vs 52%). Private sector participants also reported higher satisfaction with living conditions and personal relationships. Access to disability pension and healthcare negatively correlated with QoL, while access to public spaces, medication, transport and nursing care positively correlated with QoL. Conclusion: This study reveals significant disparities in health system performance, social factors and QoL between SCI individuals accessing public versus private healthcare in South Africa. Clinical implications: Findings highlight the need to address systemic inequities in healthcare access and social support for individuals with SCI to improve QoL across sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.