Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612913›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2025

"Who blends in and why (not)?" A qualitative study on psychotherapists' patient inclusion in blended care.

Sophie Jordan, Pauline Becker, Solveig Behr, Friederike Fenski, Christine Knaevelsrud, Johanna Boettcher, Carmen Schaeuffele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophie JordanFreie Universität Berlin, Dept. of Education and Psychology, Germany.
Pauline BeckerPsychologische Hochschule Berlin, Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Germany.
Solveig BehrFreie Universität Berlin, Dept. of Education and Psychology, Germany.
Friederike FenskiPsychologische Hochschule Berlin, Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudFreie Universität Berlin, Dept. of Education and Psychology, Germany.
Johanna BoettcherPsychologische Hochschule Berlin, Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Germany.
Carmen SchaeuffeleFreie Universität Berlin, Dept. of Education and Psychology, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Psychotherapists may act as bottlenecks in the integration of digital interventions into psychotherapy, known as blended care (BC). In the literature, various factors are discussed as potential inclusion, exclusion, or limiting criteria in BC. Method: Our aim for this interview study was to gain a deeper understanding of the factors psychotherapists consider when inviting patients to participate in BC. For this purpose, we interviewed seven psychotherapists with a psychodynamic and seven psychotherapists with a cognitive behavioral background who participated in a naturalistic trial on BC in routine outpatient psychotherapy. Results: Psychotherapists considered few fixed inclusion or exclusion criteria when considering which patients to introduce BC to. The basic technical requirements had to be met and the patients had to be "fit for outpatient therapy". Psychotherapists found patients' response to BC, like their motivation, to be a decisive factor when considering BC. Discussion: Psychotherapists emphasized patient motivation for BC as a potential bottleneck in its implementation. Therefore, a successful implementation strategy should focus on strengthening both psychotherapists' and patients' motivation to engage with BC. The openness of psychotherapists towards patient characteristics suggests that BC in outpatient care may target a broad patient population.

Indexed as

Blended careBlended therapyInternet-based interventionQualitative content analysis

Identifiers

PMID40612913
PMCPMC12221746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.