Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612907›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Selective emotion regulation in creative art production: Psychophysiological reactivity during painting reduces anxiety.

Lucas Bellaiche, Kayla Lihardo, Chloe Williams, Jill Chaffee, Kevin S LaBar, Paul Seli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucas BellaicheDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kayla LihardoDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Chloe WilliamsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jill ChaffeeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kevin S LaBarDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Paul SeliDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the literatures of aesthetics, philosophy, and psychology, art has long been revered as a powerful means to enhance mental well-being-a perspective that has been integrated into clinical practices worldwide. While some empirical research supports the emotional benefits of art production, such work often captures non-creativity factors (e.g., physical movement and social interaction), leaving the contribution of creative expression on psychophysiological outcomes unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a pre-registered, multi-modal, repeated-measures study wherein participants completed both a painting task and a non-creative but active control task. Our findings demonstrate that, above and beyond the non-creativity processes shared with the control task, painting selectively reduces anxiety, and that greater cognitive engagement and physiological reactivity characterize this reduction. These findings highlight the multi-modal determinants of emotional improvement during artistic production, providing empirical support for the therapeutic benefits of art-making specific to the regulation of anxiety.

Indexed as

Psychology

Identifiers

PMID40612907
PMCPMC12225899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.