Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612893›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2025

Linear modeling of brain activity during selective attention to continuous speech: the critical role of the N1 effect in event-related potentials to acoustic edges.

Adrian Mai, Steven A Hillyard, Daniel J Strauss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrian MaiSystems Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University & htw saar, Neurocenter, Building 90.5, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-7238-5863
Steven A HillyardCenter for Digital Neurotechnologies Saar, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-5531-2568
Daniel J StraussSystems Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University & htw saar, Neurocenter, Building 90.5, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-499X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested a cortical representation of speech through superposition of evoked responses to acoustic edges, an idea closely related to regression-based modeling approaches for studying cortical synchronization to speech via magneto- or electroencephalography (M/EEG). However, it is still unclear to what extent speech-evoked event-related potentials (ERPs) contribute to these techniques. The present study addressed this question by re-analyzing an EEG data set obtained during a selective auditory attention task in which participants focused on one of two competing speakers. Segmenting the EEG based on acoustic edges revealed ERPs with clear P1-N1-P2 complexes and enhanced N1 components elicited by attended streams (

Indexed as

Event-related potentialsN1 effectSelective auditory attentionSpeech trackingStimulus reconstructionTemporal response functions

Identifiers

PMID40612893
PMCPMC12222594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.