ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Exploring Early Mobilization Practices in Adult Intensive Care Units in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prolonged immobilization in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with adverse health outcomes, such as ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), pressure ulcers, and decreased cardiopulmonary function. Early mobilization has been shown to be an important intervention to mitigate these effects; however, there is limited information regarding its implementation in ICUs in Jordan. This study aimed to explore early mobilization practices in adult ICUs in Jordan and identify common strategies employed by healthcare professionals. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare professionals working in various ICUs across Jordan. A structured online questionnaire collected data on participants' demographics, patient selection criteria for early mobilization, and early mobilization practices. Descriptive and inferential statistics (Kruskal‒Wallis, Mann‒Whitney, Chi‒square, and Fisher's exact tests) were used, with significance at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 200 surveys were completed, primarily from physiotherapists (34.5%) and nurses (21%). The most common early mobilization strategies reported were positioning (19.3%), active mobilization (14.4%), and passive mobilization (13.1%). The majority of respondents combined early mobilization with secretion drainage activities. Respiratory stability was the most frequently cited criterion for determining patient eligibility. A significant proportion of respondents (36%) reported the absence of standardized protocols for early mobilization in their ICUs. Conclusion: Early mobilization is recognized among healthcare professionals in Jordan as an essential practice in ICUs, but there are variations in its implementation and a lack of standardized protocols. These findings highlight the need for clear guidelines and training initiatives to support consistent practice. Future research should investigate barriers to early mobilization, particularly in high-risk populations, to improve outcomes in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.