ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy of Adding Clonidine to Bupivacaine 0.25% Versus Plain Bupivacaine 0.25% Infiltration in Scalp Blocks for Supratentorial Craniotomy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Scalp blocks help attenuate hemodynamic responses and provide analgesia in neurosurgical procedures. Clonidine, an alpha-2 agonist, has been known to enhance the duration of analgesia when used as an adjuvant in peripheral nerve blocks. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of adding clonidine 2 mcg/kg to bupivacaine 0.25% versus plain bupivacaine 0.25% in scalp block infiltration in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy by comparing the duration of analgesia and perioperative hemodynamic parameters in both groups. Methods We enrolled 60 patients in this study based on our inclusion criteria. Patients were divided equally into two groups. Scalp blocks were administered after induction of general anaesthesia. Group A comprised 30 patients and received plain 0.25% bupivacaine infiltration. Group B consisted of 30 patients and received clonidine 2 mcg/kg with 0.25% bupivacaine scalp block infiltration. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded from application of Mayfield® pins (Integra Lifesciences, Princeton, NJ) every five minutes till the opening of the dura and every five minutes from dura closure up to completion of procedures. Postoperatively, heart rate and MAP were recorded hourly up to four hours. Pain was assessed in terms of a numeric rating scale (NRS) every four hours for the first 24 hours (score 0: no pain; score 10: unbearable pain). A score of 3 was considered a threshold for administration of rescue analgesia. Intraperative hemodynamic complications were noted. Results Group B has significantly lower NRS scores at 4 and 8 hours postoperatively. Group B also had significantly longer time before rescue analgesia at 792 +/- 190.8 minutes (13.2 +/- 3.18 hours) compared to Group A at 415.8 +/- 155.4 minutes (6.93 +/- 2.59 hours, p< 0.001). MAP was significantly lower in group B during the first 30 minutes from the pin application, however, there was no statistical difference in the heart rate between both the groups during this time interval. We observed a significantly lower heart rate in group B from 15 minutes onwards after dura closure, and this continued in the postoperative period. Mean arterial pressure was comparable between the groups until closure. Group B demonstrated a significantly lower MAP from the second hour in the postoperative period. Overall paracetamol consumption in the postoperative period and fentanyl requirement intraoperatively were also significantly higher in group A. Conclusion Addition of clonidine to bupivacaine in scalp blocks significantly (p<0.001) enhanced analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic control in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.