Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612850›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Bad Hair Days: A Clinical and Trichoscopic Evaluation of Scalp Lesions.

Ajeeth Rajkumar, Krishnakanth Muralidhar, Sai Preethi P, Adikrishnan Swaminathan, Murugan Sundaram, Sudha Rangarajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ajeeth RajkumarDermatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Krishnakanth MuralidharDermatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Sai Preethi PDermatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Adikrishnan SwaminathanDermatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Murugan SundaramDermatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Sudha RangarajanDermatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Scalp lesions encompass a diverse array of dermatological conditions, ranging from benign and transient issues to chronic, relapsing, or potentially scarring diseases. Accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management and prognostication. Traditional clinical examination, though essential, may not always suffice in differentiating between closely related scalp conditions. In this context, dermoscopy has emerged as a vital, non-invasive diagnostic adjunct. It provides enhanced visualization of subsurface skin and hair structures, aiding in pattern recognition and improving diagnostic accuracy for a variety of scalp disorders. Aim To evaluate and classify various scalp lesions based on clinical and trichoscopic features using a dermoscope. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted over 20 months (August 2022 to March 2024) at a tertiary care centre. A total of 200 patients were enrolled. All patients underwent detailed clinical evaluation followed by trichoscopic examination using the DermLite DL4 dermoscope (10× magnification, polarized mode). Trichoscopic features were systematically recorded and correlated with clinical diagnoses and were grouped into major diagnostic categories and analyzed to identify characteristic patterns. Results A total of 200 were included in the study, with the highest prevalence observed in the 19- to 30-year age group. The most commonly reported symptoms were itching (64.5%) and hair loss (55%). The most frequent diagnostic categories were papulosquamous disorders (39%), alopecia (31.5%), infections and infestations (16%), autoimmune conditions (8.5%), and miscellaneous disorders (5%). Psoriasis (19%) and seborrheic dermatitis (17.5%) were the most prevalent individual diagnoses, while alopecia areata accounted for 12.5% of the cases. Trichoscopic examination in psoriasis patients revealed red dots as the most common feature (92.3%), followed by silvery-white scales (84.6%), nonspecific red areas (69.2%), and the "hidden hair" sign (61.5%). Abnormal vascular patterns (25.6%), yellow dots (20.5%), and perifollicular scaling (12.8%) were less frequent. In seborrheic dermatitis, the predominant trichoscopic feature was perifollicular scaling (65.7%), followed by atypical vascular patterns (42.8%, n=15), yellow dots and interfollicular scaling (40%) each, the "hidden hair" sign (37.1%), nonspecific red areas (34.2%), and red dots (8.5%). For alopecia areata, trichoscopic findings included black dots (84%), yellow dots (72%), vellus hairs (60%), broken hair shafts (44%), and the exclamation mark sign (28%). Conclusion Trichoscopy proved to be an invaluable, non-invasive diagnostic tool in the assessment of scalp lesions. It allowed rapid visualization of hallmark features, improving diagnostic accuracy and often reducing the need for invasive procedures such as scalp biopsies. The study demonstrates that distinct trichoscopic features serve as reliable markers for differentiating papulosquamous disorders and various forms of alopecia. Additionally, trichoscopy was effective in distinguishing between scarring and non-scarring alopecia, thereby enhancing diagnostic precision. Incorporating dermoscopy into routine dermatological evaluation improves diagnostic confidence and enables earlier, targeted interventions. Given its ease of use, reproducibility, and diagnostic value, trichoscopy should be considered an essential component in the evaluation of scalp dermatoses.

Indexed as

alopeciadermoscopyscalp dermatosestrichologytrichoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40612850
PMCPMC12223461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.