Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612800›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Automated machine learning for predicting perioperative ischemia stroke in endovascularly treated ruptured intracranial aneurysm patients.

Yuhang Peng, Ke Bi, Xiaolin Zhang, Ning Huang, Xiang Ji, Weifu Chen, Ying Ma, Yuan Cheng, Yongxiang Jiang, Jianhe Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuhang Peng *Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ke Bi *Department of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaolin ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ning HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiang JiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Weifu ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ying MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yuan ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yongxiang JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jianhe YueDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate an automated machine learning model to predict perioperative ischemic stroke (PIS) risk in endovascularly treated patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs), with the goal of establishing a clinical decision-support tool. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed RIA patients undergoing endovascular treatment at our neurosurgical center (December 2013-February 2024). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to screen essential features associated with PIS. Based on these features, nine machine learning models were constructed using a training set (75% of participants) and assessed on a test set (25% of participants). Through comparative analysis, using metrics such as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC) and Brier score, we identified the optimal model-random forest (RF)-for predicting PIS. To interpret the RF models, we utilized the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: The final cohort comprised 647 consecutive RIA patients who underwent endovascular intervention. LASSO regression identified 13 clinically actionable predictors of PIS from the initial variables. These predictors encompassed: vascular risk factors (hyperlipidemia, arteriosclerosis); neuroimaging indicators of severity (modified Fisher scale, aneurysm location, and neck-to-diameter ratio); clinical status (Glasgow Coma Scale score, Hunt-Hess grade, age, sex); procedural complications (intraprocedural rupture, periprocedural re-rupture); and therapeutic determinants (therapy method and history of ischemic comorbidities). Nine machine learning algorithms were evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Among them, the RF model demonstrated the best performance, with the ROCAUC of 92.11% (95%CI: 89.74-94.48%) on the test set and 87.08% (95%CI: 81.23-92.93%) on the training set. Finally, in a prospective validation cohort, the RF predictive model demonstrated an accuracy of 88.23% in forecasting the incidence of PIS. Additionally, based on this predictive model, this study developed a highly convenient web-based calculator. Clinicians only need to input the patient's key factors into this calculator to predict the postoperative incidence of PIS and provide individualized treatment plans for the patient. Conclusion: We successfully developed and validated an interpretable machine learning framework, integrated with a clinical decision-support system, for predicting postprocedural PIS in endovascularly treated RIAs patients. This tool effectively predicted the likelihood of PIS, enabling high-risk patients to promptly take specific preventive and therapeutic measures.

Indexed as

automated machine learningcomplication predictionendovascular therapyintracranial aneurysmsperioperative ischemia stroke

Identifiers

PMID40612800
PMCPMC12222305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.