ArticleNeurology. Genetics2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Manifestations in Identifying People With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Up to 10%-15% of people with tuberous sclerosis complex (PwTSC) do not carry an identifiable pathogenic variant in Methods: We used the TSC Natural History Database, a longitudinal database of PwTSC from 22 North American centers. We used a definite genetic TSC diagnosis as our gold standard. We estimated the sensitivity (95% CI) of TSC-related skin, structural brain, renal, and cardiac manifestations, as well as combinations of these manifestations. Using a series of sensitivity analyses to test alternate assumptions, we estimated positive predictive values and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs). Results: Among the 1,300 genetics-positive PwTSC, 50.3% were female and the mean age at diagnosis was 3.7 years. The sensitivity of at least one skin or structural brain manifestation was 98.7% (95% CI 98.0-99.2). The PPV and NPV were 83.2 (95% CI 81.6-84.6) and 98.4% (95% CI 97.8-98.8), respectively, while assuming 50% prevalence and 80% specificity. Including cardiac manifestations marginally increased the sensitivity, PPV, and NPV to 99.5% (95% CI 98.9-99.7), 83.3% (95% CI 81.8-84.7), and 99.4% (95% CI 99.0-99.6), respectively. Other combinations of TSC manifestations had lower or similar diagnostic accuracy. Discussion: Assessment of brain and skin manifestations in family members of genetics-positive PwTSC is sufficient to screen for TSC in most cases, with excellent sensitivity and NPV. Our findings are potentially applicable to family members of genetics-negative PwTSC. Further cardiac screening may optimize diagnostic accuracy in selected cases. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that a combination of brain and skin manifestations is highly sensitive for diagnosing TSC in family members of patients with genetically confirmed TSC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.