ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Construction and Verification of Risk Predictive Nomogram in Patients of Connective Tissue Disease with Severe Pneumonia.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To construct Risk Predictive Nomogram in patients of connective tissue disease (CTD) with severe pneumonia. Methods: Eighty CID patients with severe pneumonia in rheumatology and respiratory department of chongqing University Three Gorges hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Independent risk factors for severe pneumonia in CTD were screened by univariate and binomial logistic regression analysis. The nomogram was constructed by R software. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the nomogram's discrimination, and the calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to reflect the nomogram's calibration. Results: The study cohort was including 48 patients in the general pneumonia group and 32 patients in the severe pneumonia group. The model variables included Ln CD4/CD8, Ln CRP, Ln PCT and Ln IFN-γ. Hosmer-lemeshow test P value less than 0.05 (χ2 = 7.753, Conclusion: The prediction nomogram in this study is helpful for clinical staffs to screen high-risk patients with severe pneumonia in CTD, and has high clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.