ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2025
Design and comparison of PCR-ELISA reaction with other available hybridization methods to identify types 11, 16, and 18 of the human papillomavirus.
Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a significant etiological agent in cervical cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of PCR-ELISA for detecting HPV genotypes 11, 16, and 18 compared to the conventional hybridization methods. Materials and Methods: PCR-ELISA was designed and optimized to detect target HPV genotypes using biotin-labeled probes. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility were assessed through intra-assay and inter-assay variability tests. Additionally, a cost-benefit analysis was performed to compare PCR-ELISA with RT-PCR and gel electrophoresis. Results: PCR-ELISA demonstrated high sensitivity (HPV18: 94.92%, HPV16: 98.36%, HPV11: 93.75%) and specificity (100% for all genotypes), with Kappa values ranging from 0.84 to 0.92, indicating strong agreement with the reference standard. Reproducibility analysis showed intra-assay CVs below 5% for most samples and inter-assay CVs within acceptable limits. The cost-benefit analysis revealed significant reductions in reagent and equipment costs compared to RT-PCR, making PCR-ELISA a cost-effective alternative. Conclusion: PCR-ELISA offers a reliable, sensitive and cost-effective method for HPV detection, particularly in resource-limited settings. Its simplicity and compatibility with existing workflows makes it a promising tool for routine diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.