ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Directionality of neural activity in and out of the seizure onset zone in focal epilepsy.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Unstable slow oscillations couple with epileptogenic fast-rhythm bistability in sleep-related epilepsy: A stereoelectroencephalographic study.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Thalamocortical network dynamics in focal epilepsy: SEEG investigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Static and dynamic intracerebral signal analysis reveals protective networks against seizures in drug-resistant focal epilepsy.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Utility of Interictal Data in Guiding Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery.Pediatric neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Multisensory Rhythmic Entrainment as a Mechanistic Framework for Modulating Prefrontal Network Stability in Focal Epilepsy.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy affects over 50 million people worldwide, with approximately 30% experiencing drug-resistant forms that may require surgical intervention. Accurate localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is crucial for effective treatment, but how best to use intracranial EEG data to delineate the EZ remains unclear. Previous studies have used the directionality of neural activities across the brain to investigate seizure dynamics and localise the EZ. However, the different connectivity measures used across studies have often provided inconsistent insights about the direction and the localisation power of signal flow as a biomarker for EZ localisation. In a data-driven approach, this study employs a large set of 13 distinct directed connectivity measures to evaluate neural activity flow in and out the seizure onset zone (SOZ) during interictal and ictal periods. These measures test the hypotheses of "sink SOZ" (SOZ dominantly receiving neural activities during interictal periods) and "source SOZ" (SOZ dominantly transmitting activities during ictal periods). While the results were different across connectivity measures, several measures consistently supported higher connectivity directed towards the SOZ in interictal periods and higher connectivity directed away during ictal periods. Comparing six distinct metrics of node behaviour in the network, we found that SOZ separates itself from the rest of the network, allowing for the metric of "
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.