ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025
Psychometric properties of the Social knowledge test (SKT) and the Combined stories test (COST) in people with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder.
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A remote and avatar-based approach for social cognitive impairments in psychotic disorders: A Canadian adaptation of RC2S.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) often present with impaired social cognition. Among the measures available to assess these deficits, the Combined stories test (COST) and the Social knowledge test (SKT), that respectively target theory of mind (ToM) and social knowledge, have shown promising psychometric properties in prior studies. Test-retest reliability was however only examined in the general population, and the acceptability of these tests was not previously examined. This study aimed to further document the psychometric properties of the COST and the SKT and the acceptability of these tests in people with SSD and community controls (CO). Methods: Forty-four (44) participants with SSD and 49 CO were administered the COST and SKT twice, about 4 weeks apart, and were asked to rate the acceptability of the tests on a 0 (Very unpleasant) to 10 (Very pleasant) point scale at both timepoints. Results: In both groups, the results revealed an excellent inter-rater reliability and a good test-retest reliability for both tests, though the control non-social reasoning measure included in the COST showed poorer test-retest reliability in the SSD group. Some practice effects were observed but the ToM score from the COST and the SKT total score showed no evidence of ceiling effects at either timepoints. The average acceptability scores ranged between 7.8/10 and 8.3/10 for the COST and between 6.8/10 and 7.9/10 for the SKT. Conclusion: The SKT and the COST present with good psychometric properties, representing good options for future studies or for use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.