ArticleRSC advances2025
Study on the influence of different factors on the direct treatment of high turbidity water by microfiltration processes.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BSA-modified g-CNanoscale advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, traditional high turbidity water treatment technologies (coagulation-sedimentation-filtration) face issues such as non-compliant effluent quality, sediment compaction, and poor sludge discharge. Meanwhile, membrane filtration technology suffers from severe membrane fouling in high turbidity water treatment. Therefore, the development of green and low-carbon high turbidity water treatment technologies is urgently needed. This study employs microfiltration to directly filter high turbidity water, investigating turbidity, filtration methods, and transmembrane pressure difference to elucidate the mechanisms of mitigating membrane fouling in high turbidity water treatment. The results indicate that both excessively high and low influent turbidity are detrimental to high turbidity water treatment. Low turbidity fails to effectively protect the membrane, exacerbating membrane fouling, while high turbidity leads to excessive cake layer thickness, reducing membrane flux. Therefore, the optimal treatment turbidity must be determined based on the specifications of the experimental setup. In this study, the optimal treatment turbidity is 900 NTU. Under constant pressure conditions, cross-flow filtration effectively controls the thickness of the filter cake layer, mitigates membrane fouling, and maintains a high membrane flux. When the influent turbidity is 900 NTU, the membrane flux recovery rate and filtration flux are 80.14% and 0.9077 m h
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.