ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Perspectives in transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing the Clinical Applicability of Ultrasound Radiomics for Differentiating Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyomas.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Adenomyosis-Modern Techniques for Ultrasound and Histo-Pathological Diagnosis of the Endo-Myometrial Junction Zone Changes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenomyosis is a common gynecological condition affecting women of reproductive age, posing significant diagnostic challenges due to its diverse clinical presentations. This extended opinion study critically reviews the diagnostic methods for adenomyosis, with a focus on transvaginal sonography (TVS), a widely used non-invasive imaging technique. The study evaluates the effectiveness, limitations, and clinical applicability of TVS, while exploring the role of histopathological confirmation when non-invasive methods are insufficient. Advancements in TVS, including three-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler, have enhanced diagnostic precision, particularly in assessing uterine morphology and blood flow. Additionally, artificial intelligence integration offers potential to further optimize diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. While histopathological examination remains the gold standard, its use is often impractical in patients who do not undergo hysterectomy. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of TVS in diagnosing adenomyosis, analyzing its accuracy, strengths, and limitations across diverse patient populations. Results suggest that TVS is a reliable diagnostic tool, though its accuracy improves when combined with magnetic resonance imaging, especially in complex cases. Ongoing research is needed to refine TVS capabilities and identify non-invasive alternatives to histopathological confirmation, improving accessibility and diagnostic efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.