Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612581›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Mechanisms to build research capacity in the rural health workplace: a realist synthesis.

David Schmidt, Emma Webster, David Lyle

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David SchmidtFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Rural Health (Orange/Dubbo), University of Sydney, Dubbo, NSW, Australia.
Emma WebsterFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Rural Health (Orange/Dubbo), University of Sydney, Dubbo, NSW, Australia.
David LyleFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Rural Health (Orange/Dubbo), University of Sydney, Dubbo, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Workplace-based research training contributes to research capability and capacity in rural areas where access to university expertise is limited. Rural health complexities and the diverse approaches previously used to build research capacity have led to a lack of clarity about how to build research capacity within rural health services. Methods: Using a critical realist foundation, we explored distributed workplace-based rural research training and synthesized five studies centered in rural New South Wales, Australia. Critical realism allowed the exploration of the structural supports and barriers for workplace-based research training activities and the ability of individuals to pursue research activities within rural health workplaces. Results: The component studies showed that distributed rural research training programs improve individual research capability by developing research skill, increasing research experience and facilitating research networks across sectors. Rural research activities are characterized by individual agency and partnering or relationships to access support and expertise. Structural barriers including a lack of operational planning for research and few ongoing research opportunities limit translation of capability into research capacity. Discussion: Individual workplace-based research training is effective, but not sufficient to build and maintain research capacity. Structural supports such as organizational commitment and careful training design can maximize cooperative partnerships with education partners. Addressing both structural and individual factors is needed to build rural health research capacity and generate real-world health research to drive meaningful improvements in rural health.

Indexed as

distributed trainingrealist synthesisresearch educationrural healthworkplace-based education

Identifiers

PMID40612581
PMCPMC12222289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.