Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612570›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2025

Chronic kidney disease in older adults: trends in prevalence and healthcare service quality from 2012 to 2018.

Tim Bothe, Elke Schaeffner, Anna Pöhlmann, Anne-Katrin Fietz, Julia Freitag, Nina Mielke, Jean-François Chenot, Muhammad Helmi Barghouth, Elizabeth Mathias, Simone Kiel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tim BotheInstitute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4404-2379
Elke SchaeffnerInstitute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-4577
Anna PöhlmannInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1494-3240
Anne-Katrin FietzInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4395-4176
Julia FreitagAOK Nordost - Die Gesundheitskasse, Potsdam, Germany.
Nina MielkeInstitute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-9823
Jean-François ChenotInstitute for Community Medicine, Department of General Practice, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8877-2950
Muhammad Helmi BarghouthInstitute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5721-9367
Elizabeth MathiasInstitute for Community Medicine, Department of General Practice, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3679-671X
Simone KielInstitute for Community Medicine, Department of General Practice, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-1244
Natalie EbertInstitute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-3315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Data on the healthcare service quality for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are vital for guiding practitioners, patients and healthcare policy makers. We examined new quality indicators for outpatient diagnostics and treatments in older patients with CKD, focusing on trends between 2012 and 2018. Methods: The study included cross-sectional German statutory health insurance claims data from four independent random samples (2012, 2014, 2016, 2018), each with 62 200 individuals aged ≥70 years. We analyzed coded CKD prevalence and incidence, non-recommended drug prescriptions (dual prescriptions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with angiotensin II receptor blockers; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in CKD stage 4-5), as well as albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) and dipstick testing in incident CKD cases. Results: After standardization, the samples included 58.4%-59.3% females, and mean ages ranging from 77.4 to 78.9 years. CKD prevalence increased from 17.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.5; 18.1] in 2012 to 25.7% (95% CI 25.4; 26.1) in 2018. CKD incidence rose slightly from 6.4% (95% CI 6.2; 6.6) to 7.6% (95% CI 7.4; 7.9). Non-recommended drug prescriptions, which were below 5% in 2012, decreased by more than half by 2018. ACR and dipstick testing varied inconsistently over time, ranging from 11.4% to 13.5% and 55.4% to 57.2%, respectively. Conclusions: CKD prevalence in older adults in Germany rose by eight percentage points from 2012 to 2018 while prescriptions of non-recommended drugs decreased in patients with CKD, indicating better diagnosis and guideline adherence. However, ACR and dipstick diagnostic was alarmingly low, and remained below recommended levels outside kidney specialist care, showing areas for improvement.

Indexed as

CKDhealth claims dataincidenceprevalencequality indicators

Identifiers

PMID40612570
PMCPMC12223366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.