Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612537›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2025

Therapeutic Intervention in Pediatric Endoscopy: Management of Postsurgical Complications and Bleeding.

André Hoerning, Guido Seitz, Dominique Schluckebier, Jan de Laffolie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

André HoerningPediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Guido SeitzDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Giessen, Germany.
Dominique SchluckebierDepartment of pediatric gastroenterology, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Jan de LaffolieGeneral Paediatrics and Neonatology, University Childrens Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric surgical complications and their endoscopic treatment approaches share a unique challenge of small anatomy, highly volatile situations and the need to be flexible with instruments which have been designed for older and bigger patients. In the last few decades, endoscopic interventions have emerged as a minimally invasive alternative approach to standard open closure procedures for the treatment of postsurgical complications. Summary: This review summarizes the most common situations and techniques in pediatric endoscopy taking on postsurgical complications, including opportunities to improve outcome and overcome barriers of individualized therapy as compared to adult strategies. Key Message: Endoscopic management of postsurgical complications is highly effective and associated with high success rates, low mortality, and minimal recurrence of the underlying pathology.

Indexed as

ChildrenComplicationsEndoscopyInterventionSurgery

Identifiers

PMID40612537
PMCPMC12215443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.