ReviewToxicological research2025
Advancing hepatotoxicity assessment: current advances and future directions.
Review in Toxicological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) to Assist Medicinal Chemistry.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Opportunities and challenges for analytical chemists: organ-on-chip devices as new approach methods (NAMs) for identifying potential toxins.The Analyst · 2026Review
- Hepatocyte Models for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Non-HepG2 Cell Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Hepatotoxicity Assessment of Anshenbunao Syrup by Multi-Component Quantification In Vivo/In Vitro and Cell Biological Evaluations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review on bacterial endophytic secondary metabolites: a road map from crude extract to lead molecule production.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Alternatives to animal models in gastroenterology and hepatology research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During drug development, it is crucial to ensure that a drug exhibits effective activity in its target cells and organs. However, regardless of its effectiveness, a drug cannot be administered to patients if it exhibits toxicity in vivo. Based on pharmacokinetics, most drugs are cleared from the liver after entering the body, and only the remaining fraction reaches the target organ to exert therapeutic effects. Consequently, drugs with in vivo toxicity often manifest hepatotoxicity as an initial sign. This highlights the critical importance of hepatotoxicity assessment in drug development. Currently, hepatotoxicity assessments primarily rely on animal models and primary human hepatocytes. However, there are instances in which drugs pass these evaluations, are released to the market, and are later withdrawn because of unforeseen toxicity in patients. To enhance prediction accuracy, emerging hepatotoxicity models-including advanced 3D liver culture systems, in silico approaches such as AI-based models, and improved in vitro assays-are gaining significant attention. This review systematically compares conventional 2D models, animal models, organ-on-a-chip systems, and computational models, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and predictive reliability. By critically evaluating these methodologies, we propose future directions for refining hepatotoxicity assessment strategies, with an emphasis on enhancing translational relevance, reducing reliance on animal testing, and integrating AI-driven predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.