Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612443›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2025

Effects of galloyl group on the astringency perception of epigallocatechin gallate and epigallocatechin.

Zhenyu Zhou, Qian Huang, Wangyang Shen, Weiping Jin, Guoyan Yang, Wenjing Huang, Cheng Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhenyu ZhouCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, 430023, China.
Qian HuangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, 430023, China.
Wangyang ShenCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, 430023, China.
Weiping JinCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, 430023, China.
Guoyan YangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, 430023, China.
Wenjing HuangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, 430023, China.
Cheng GuoCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, 430023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The astringency in green tea primarily originates from gallate-type and non-gallate-type catechins. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is a gallate-type catechin, which has a strong astringency and is the most abundant catechin in tea. Unlike EGCG, epigallocatechin (EGC) has one fewer galloyl group on the C3 oxygen atom and exhibits a weaker astringency. Taking EGCG and EGC as representative catechins, this study investigated the effects of the galloyl group on their astringency. The interactions of EGCG and EGC with salivary proteins were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed using fluorescence spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry, and molecular docking. The surface roughness and viscoelasticity of the salivary film were then studied to relate the molecular interactions and perceived astringency. Additionally, the bindings of EGCG and EGC to astringency receptor proteins were also simulated. The results revealed that the galloyl group enabled the EGCG-promoted aggregation of salivary proteins, resulting in a stronger astringency through both tactile and gustatory pathways. In contrast, EGC exhibited a weaker astringency only through the gustatory pathway.

Indexed as

Astringency receptorEpigallocatechinEpigallocatechin gallateMolecular interactionSalivary filmSalivary protein

Identifiers

PMID40612443
PMCPMC12226114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.