ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Case Report: Rupture of the cardiac free wall after myocardial infarction confirmed by aortic computed tomography angiography.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subacute Left Ventricular Free-Wall Rupture After Thrombolysis: From Concealed Rupture on CT to Successful Surgical Patch Repair.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Risk prediction models for cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Free wall rupture is a rare complication of myocardial infarction, occurring as early as a few hours after myocardial infarction. It usually happens after transmural myocardial infarction and has a very high mortality rate. The diagnosis of free wall rupture requires echocardiographic evidence of pericardial leakage or pericardial tamponade. The patient's cause of death is often attributed to other causes such as cardiac arrhythmia unless determined by open heart surgery or autopsy. Diagnostic tools for post-infarction cardiac free wall rupture are limited to date. Case presentation: We present a case of myocardial infarction in a patient who presented with atypical chest pain. Subsequent coronary angiography revealed small vessel disease, however, the patient's severe clinical presentation was not consistent with small vessel disease. The initial clinical presentation did not rule out aortic dissection, prompting further investigation through aortic computed tomography. This imaging technique revealed a rupture of the free wall of the heart accompanied by a large amount of bloody pericardial effusion. Unfortunately, attempts to puncture and drain the effusion were unsuccessful and the patient eventually succumbed. Conclusions: When patients present with more severe clinical manifestations that are not consistent with myocardial infarction, it is important to be alert to the possibility of cardiac rupture in addition to identifying the possibility of aortic dissection. Aortic CTA may be able to confirm the diagnosis of cardiac rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.